WM Review – ‘Undoubtedly Magisterial Acts’? Pope Honorius and Roberto de Mattei

Photo: Another view of the mosaic in the church of St Agnes, Rome, which includes Pope Honorius holding the church. If the anti-Honorius myths were true, would this not be very strange? Source. As Amazon Associates, we earn from qualifying purchases through our Amazon links. See also The WM Review Shop.
Were Pope Honorius’ controversial letters to Sergius acts of the papal magisterium – or something else? Part II of our early study on the matter.

Introduction

This is a re-release of an article published on 29 July 2021 – one of the first articles published at The WM Review. It has now been revised and updated.

This is the second part of my study of Professor Roberto de Mattei’s treatment of Honorius, the so-called “heretic pope”. In his book, Love for the Papacy and Filial Resistance to the Pope in the History of the Church, Professor de Mattei presents the events in such a way as to bolster his own very particular “recognise and resist” view of the crisis in the Church. In certain respects, his narrative is closely aligned to those of anti-Catholics and anti-papalist.


Originally published in The WM Review. Read original article