If you are a traditional Catholic and you still have not figured out how much Catholics are hated by the Synodal Church and how rabid its persecution of Christ’s Church is, the next story should help.>The following is yet another example of how the same men who (to paraphrase Padre Peregrino) will “publicly honor Anglicans, trannies, satanic American rock stars, abortion promoters, Buddhist monks, Muslims, Jews, liberal Catholics, globalist leaders, prisoners, and even animals” will persecute you—the Christ-loving, Latin Mass–attending, faithful Catholic—in ways that would make Genrikh Yagoda proud.>In recent weeks, a new controversy has emerged in the Archdiocese of Maceió in Brazil that illustrates the deepening conflict between Catholics and Synodalists. According to reports circulated on various platforms, the archdiocese has issued or authorized a notice stating that any priest who celebrates the traditional Latin Mass outside the single location he has approved will be considered guilty of public schism and will incur automatic excommunication.

Originally published in Radical Fidelity. Read original article

I last came across such pseudo-theological drivel in the books by the New Age charlatan Neale Donald Walsch, who fleeced the world with his series Conversations with God. In these books he claimed that he engaged in a two-way dialogue with God, receiving messages that we are all one with the divine, there is no sin or hell, and we create our own reality.>Actually, now that I read my own sentence, I realize that sounds an awful lot like something that could come from the mouths of any of the Synodal Modernist heretics currently claiming to be the Catholic hierarchy.>On that note then, enter said Synodal Church’s leader, Robert Prevost, aka Leo XIV.

Originally published in Radical Fidelity. Read original article

An article that appeared on the liberal anti‑Catholic filth publication Religion Digital’s website on February 23 highlighted once again how Leo XIV, also known as Robert Prevost, is conducting a total and comprehensive campaign against what he sees as threats to his agenda.>This campaign seeks to purge not only the Synodal Church of any semblance of traditional Catholic values but, ultimately, civilization at large.>What is important about what follows is the coded message in Leo XIV’s warnings to the Spanish “bishops”. This is not supposed to be a defense of the VOX party’s ideology or policies. I am in no way saying that what they have to offer is the ideal political home for Traditional Catholics. What should be recognized, however, is that within the Spanish political landscape VOX have become the most hospitable political home for Spaniards with conservative and traditional Catholic values.

Originally published in Radical Fidelity. Read original article

An important principle in Freemasonry and other occult practices is to “hide things in plain sight,” but I guess the depraved worldly kingdom has descended to such satanic depths that they do not have to anymore. Neither are their friends in the Vatican trying to hide it. They are openly telling you who they are and what they are doing.>The man illegally occupying the Seat of Peter has been appointing one pro-Alphabet Sin bishop after another, and now he wants you to know, in case you have not been connecting the dots over the past sixty years, exactly who has enthroned himself in the Vatican by appointing a Mason-friendly archbishop.>Those who are regular readers know what I am going to say next:

Originally published in Radical Fidelity. Read original article

Every age of the Church presents its trials. Some are moral, some political, some disciplinary. Ours, however, is doctrinal in character, and therefore touches the very nerve of Catholic life. It is no longer sufficient to speak in generalities about confusion, ambiguity, or crisis. The faithful are increasingly forced to confront a more precise and uncomfortable question:>What, exactly, does the Church require of us in regard to obedience to the Pope and the Magisterium, and what follows if that obligation collides with the faith that Catholics have always professed?>This is the question I wish to face in this essay, cautiously and, I hope, with charity. I know my readers. Many of you are passionate souls, and the comment section has often become the stage for spirited and sometimes heated debate. My hope is that, in a spirit of patience and goodwill, we might together move a little closer to the truth.

Originally published in Radical Fidelity. Read original article

>A few hours ago, the latest instalment in the SSPX Episcopal Consecration soap opera dropped when the SSPX published the response of the Superior General, Fr. Davide Pagliarani, to “Cardinal” Victor Manuel Fernandez.>In early February 2026, tensions between Rome and the SSPX intensified when the Society announced its intention to proceed with episcopal consecrations on 1 July 2026 without pontifical mandate, invoking a state of necessity to ensure the continuation of its apostolate. The Holy See responded swiftly. Through the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith under Cardinal Víctor Manuel Fernández, and with the approval of “Pope” Leo XIV, Rome warned that such consecrations would constitute a decisive rupture of ecclesial communion and carry grave canonical consequences. At the same time, the Vatican offered a renewed doctrinal dialogue aimed at clarifying the “minimum requirements for full communion,” particularly regarding adherence to the Second Vatican Council and the post-conciliar Magisterium, on condition that the planned consecrations be suspended. It is to this proposal that Father Davide Pagliarani, Superior General of the Society, responds in his letter of 18 February 2026.

Originally published in Radical Fidelity. Read original article

I have an honest and sincere question. Literally not a day goes by when you consult any Catholic news platform without encountering a whole barrage of dispatches from the synodal wasteland about the latest scandals. It is daily, if not hourly, by now.>For a Catholic commentator, and more importantly, as a watchman and my brother’s keeper, the garbage born from the false religion nesting in Rome comes like an overwhelming deluge. Some days I hardly know what to report on and what to leave out. >So here is my question. Or rather, my questions. If you are a follower of this new religion—or worse, one of its promoters—how do you explain it all away? How do you defend it? How do you sleep at night? How do you keep telling yourself it is Catholicism? How do you convince yourself, and those in your care, that Christ is pleased by it?

Originally published in Radical Fidelity. Read original article

It is an absolute pleasure and privilege to present an interview with the inimitable Stephen Kokx, who of course needs no introduction. As a Catholic journalist par excellence, author, and the man behind the Kokx News Substack and YouTube channel, Stephen has become one of the leading voices in the fight for Catholic truth and orthodoxy. Not only is he tirelessly advancing the Catholic counter‑revolution, but he is also remarkably selfless in his efforts to platform and support other voices in this crucial conversation.>Stephen was kind enough to answer a few questions on a subject dear to both our hearts: Catholic Integralism. By publishing this interview, I hope to stimulate discussion among our audience with the aim of resurrecting this ideal as a practical reality.>Follow Kokx News on YouTube, X, and Substack!

Originally published in Radical Fidelity. Read original article

This past Sunday, February 15, Leo XIV made an unassuming visit to a seaside parish in Ostia, where he offered the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass in what was presented as an ordinary diocesan engagement. The ceremony unfolded quietly, marked by active involvement from members of the congregation and little external fanfare. But as we know, in Synodal La La Land there is always some irregularity brewing not far beneath the surface, and this was no exception. Amid the otherwise routine character of the occasion, one feature stood out unmistakably to those attentive to the integrity of Catholic liturgical tradition: young women serving within the sanctuary at the altar.>Yip, I hope the Trad Inc. we-are-so-back crowd took notice. Their Saviour of Tradition had no qualms to positively re-emphasize and promote the gender confusion wrecking so much in the visible Church: from Parish Susans sacrilegiously handling Christ in the Eucharist as so-called Eucharistic Ministers, to girls in Adidas sneakers driving males out of their God-appointed roles in the sanctuary.>So why is it not just problematic, but downright wrong?

Originally published in Radical Fidelity. Read original article

In the midst of the current soap opera playing out — starring the heretics in Rome and the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) — something landed on my virtual desk that is relevant and worth sharing, as it has a direct bearing on the question of whether the SSPX should even ask for approval.>Those who read Radical Fidelity regularly know where I — and others like myself — stand on this issue.>Regardless, and in case you or your friends are being swallowed up in the confusion and losing sight of reality, hopefully this will help put things back into perspective.

Originally published in Radical Fidelity. Read original article